I've been living in Japan for just over 2 months now and I still can't read the signs, but it's always comforting to know that I'll always be able to read numbers. In many countries, numbers look the same. Sometimes the numbers are up and sometimes, like now, they are down. We all have to figure out a way to keep our numbers healthy at the very least. Whether it's the numbers in our bank account or our weight, it all matters to us.
What about the numbers affecting the Earth? For example, the numbers 2 and 2030. I just read that by 2030, we might need 2 planets to sustain our needs. Where will we get 2 planets? Are we going to colonize Mars as some suggest? Will it be possible to make our lives so efficient that we can live on 1 planet? Sometimes I think about whether having children in the developed world is responsible. Can we actually dare to dream that our children and grandchildren will live in a world where they have enough to eat and drink? How about the number, well actually the fraction, 1/3? That's the amount that biodiversity has declined by since 1970. How about the number 50? That's the number of countries experiencing a "moderate to severe water stress on a year-round basis," according to the Guardian. Here's the link to the article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/29/climatechange-endangeredhabitats
Numbers are knowledge. Knowledge is power. What will we do with this new found power to predict our doom? Yesterday's Guardian looked at the possibility that we could become like the Maya - when the Maya were at the height of their power, they crashed. Will we become like them? Here's the article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/28/climatechange-population
I really hope we can learn from our mistakes and make the Earth a better place. After all, this is the only place we have to live on.
Wednesday, 29 October 2008
Wednesday, 8 October 2008
The Recevolution
Of course, many economists are now saying we are in a recession or on the brink. There's the old saying that the Chinese word for crisis is the same word for opportunity - that's exactly what we are in right now. In the US debate on October 7, both candidates said they are in favour of tax cuts. Yes, it's very prudent to decrease government programs right at the moment that people need them most. McCain believes that reducing taxes for businesses will create more jobs, but I believe that most large business owners might just take the money for themselves. We are also losing jobs in Ontario due to the decrease in the manufacturing sector. Yet, Ontario is now growing as a user of renewable energy - if we could turn the abandoned plants into useful plants for the manufacturing of wind turbines and solar panels, it would be a win win. Many people trained in the manufacturing sector to have good jobs - they could keep those jobs and contribute to a cleaner, more 21st century economy.
For people who will not lose their jobs but are feeling the squeeze in other areas, consumption can always be reduced. Because of cold Canadian winters, our heating bills are always high, but many homes do not have enough insulation. People should be given money by the government for weatherization and for energy audits. At the moment, Ontario pays people for erecting wind turbines and solar panels - they should be paid for audits as well.
One of the most important issues right now is food. Many countries do not have enough and others import too much. During World War II, the Canadian government encouraged people to grow food on their lawns because rationing was occuring. We need exactly the same thing today - everyone's bills would go down and organic farming would get a huge boost. The Government needs to educate people on how to grow their own food - it's as simple as that. This is also a big issue here in Japan because only 38% of food in Japan is grown locally due to the mountainous terrain. In Japan, most people do not have backyards or front lawns - why not grow food on the roof? Japan would be much more pleasant with more plants. As many people point out, Tokyo is a concrete jungle - we need more grass.
As the title of this blog suggests, we need a recevolution not a recession. Our world is changing so quickly and we need to change with it. Our current economic system is not working - take a look at the US. If we use this crisis as an opportunity, we can change the world for the better.
For people who will not lose their jobs but are feeling the squeeze in other areas, consumption can always be reduced. Because of cold Canadian winters, our heating bills are always high, but many homes do not have enough insulation. People should be given money by the government for weatherization and for energy audits. At the moment, Ontario pays people for erecting wind turbines and solar panels - they should be paid for audits as well.
One of the most important issues right now is food. Many countries do not have enough and others import too much. During World War II, the Canadian government encouraged people to grow food on their lawns because rationing was occuring. We need exactly the same thing today - everyone's bills would go down and organic farming would get a huge boost. The Government needs to educate people on how to grow their own food - it's as simple as that. This is also a big issue here in Japan because only 38% of food in Japan is grown locally due to the mountainous terrain. In Japan, most people do not have backyards or front lawns - why not grow food on the roof? Japan would be much more pleasant with more plants. As many people point out, Tokyo is a concrete jungle - we need more grass.
As the title of this blog suggests, we need a recevolution not a recession. Our world is changing so quickly and we need to change with it. Our current economic system is not working - take a look at the US. If we use this crisis as an opportunity, we can change the world for the better.
Power
In the news, power is definitely the number one issue right now, whether it's political or electrical. I'm currently living in Japan and there have been many prime ministers here over the last year. The new Prime Minister, Aso, comes from a very political family and many people say that he's completely out of touch with what voters want. I'm teaching English here and one of my students said that Japan needs a revolutionary change but Aso will not deliver it.
Meanwhile, in Canada and the US, it's election season. In Canada, we certainly do not need 4 more years of Harper. If you live in the riding of Ottawa South, I urge you to vote for Hijal DeSarkar. I have known him for a long time and he's very trustworthy. He's running for the NDP and he recently told me that Jack Layton has a chance of becoming leader of the Opposition - I would be extremely proud of the NDP and of Canada if this happened. We definitely need changes in Canada so we don't become just a copy of the US.
I just watched the American presidential debate. You know the old adage that most communication is non-verbal - well, McCain said it all. Just the way he sits in his chair tells you how uncomfortable he is with normal people. Obama sat forward and really listened to what McCain and the audience said and I congratulate him on that. However, although I support Obama, he is in favour of offshore drilling and nuclear power. But, Obama was kind enough to point out that the US only has 3% of the world's oil reserves, but consumes 25% of the world's oil. Does this justify offshore drilling? Oil is expected to run out in my lifetime, so we really need to start thinking about driving less. Speaking of which, a small island in Denmark called Samso recently became completely carbon neutral. Everything is powered with wind turbines and solar panels and wood chip boilers are used for heat. If the world expects to achieve this someday, we have to think small. Today, most power plants are on a large scale and are hooked up to an enormous grid - the only way we can get out of this is to build smaller plants and to use renewable energy right where it is consumed.
There are many important people around the world today that support nuclear power while ignoring that merely digging the uranium out of the ground causes an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. This doesn't even recognize the fact that we have no idea what to do with the waste. If we are to tackle climate change, we have to decrease energy consumption for rich countries - it's as simple as that. Then, we won't need any new nuclear power plants.
Meanwhile, in Canada and the US, it's election season. In Canada, we certainly do not need 4 more years of Harper. If you live in the riding of Ottawa South, I urge you to vote for Hijal DeSarkar. I have known him for a long time and he's very trustworthy. He's running for the NDP and he recently told me that Jack Layton has a chance of becoming leader of the Opposition - I would be extremely proud of the NDP and of Canada if this happened. We definitely need changes in Canada so we don't become just a copy of the US.
I just watched the American presidential debate. You know the old adage that most communication is non-verbal - well, McCain said it all. Just the way he sits in his chair tells you how uncomfortable he is with normal people. Obama sat forward and really listened to what McCain and the audience said and I congratulate him on that. However, although I support Obama, he is in favour of offshore drilling and nuclear power. But, Obama was kind enough to point out that the US only has 3% of the world's oil reserves, but consumes 25% of the world's oil. Does this justify offshore drilling? Oil is expected to run out in my lifetime, so we really need to start thinking about driving less. Speaking of which, a small island in Denmark called Samso recently became completely carbon neutral. Everything is powered with wind turbines and solar panels and wood chip boilers are used for heat. If the world expects to achieve this someday, we have to think small. Today, most power plants are on a large scale and are hooked up to an enormous grid - the only way we can get out of this is to build smaller plants and to use renewable energy right where it is consumed.
There are many important people around the world today that support nuclear power while ignoring that merely digging the uranium out of the ground causes an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. This doesn't even recognize the fact that we have no idea what to do with the waste. If we are to tackle climate change, we have to decrease energy consumption for rich countries - it's as simple as that. Then, we won't need any new nuclear power plants.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)